Peer Review and Reflective Teaching Practices: An Effective Mechanism for Quality Enhancement in Higher Education

  • Sony Jalarajan Raj
  • Susan R. Massey
  • Soumya Jose

Abstract

Quality education and teacher accountability are predominant issues generating apprehension in higher education. Traditional methods of evaluation are giving way to more contemporary methods. One technique that is being implemented in many universities throughout the world that provides feedback and improves pedagogical approaches is a formative and collaborative process known as peer review of teaching (PRT). Review of the literature included 34 studies which identified five themes that offered pros and cons regarding the viability of PRT in teacher evaluations. A matrix table was created on additional 27 studies on the SWOT (Strength, Weakness, Opportunity and Threat) analysis framework. Four factors were derived from the SWOT framework that indicates PTR as a positive strategy in higher education.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Addams, L. & Allred, A. T. (2013). The first step in proactively managing students’ careers: Teaching self-SWOT analysis. Academy of Educational Leadership Journal, 17(4), 43-51.

Allen, L. (2002). Consenting adults in private - Union and management perspectives on peer observation of teaching. Retrieved from http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/resources/detail/resource_database/id26_consenting_adults_in_private

Al Qahtani, S., Kattan, T., Al Harbi, K., & Seefeldt, M. (2011). Some thoughts on educational peer evaluation. South-East Asian Journal of Medical Education, 5(1), 47 – 49. Retrieved from http://seajme.md.chula.ac.th/articleVol5No1/SP1_Saad%20Al%20Qahtani.pdf

Archer, J. C., Norcini, J., & Davies, H. (2005). Use of SPRAT for peer review of paediatricians in training. British Medical Journal, 330, 1251-1253. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38447.610451.8F

Archer, J. C., Norcini, J., Southgate, L., Heard, S., & Davies, H. (2008). Mini-PAT (Peer Assessment Tool): A valid component of a national assessment programme in the UK? Advances in Health Sciences Education, 13, 181-192. doi: 10.1007/s10459-006-9033-3

Atwood, C. H., Taylor, J. W., & Hutchings, P. A. (2000). Why are chemists and other scientists afraid of the peer review of teaching? Journal of Chemical Education, 77, 239-244. Retrieved from http://pubs.acs.org.ezproxy.lib.monash.edu.au/doi/pdf/10.1021/ed077p239

Bedore, P., & O'Sullivan, B. (2011). Addressing instructor ambivalence about peer review and self-assessment. Journal of the Council of Writing Program Administrators, 34(2), 11-36

Bell, A., & Mladenovic, R. (2008). The benefits of peer observation of teaching for tutor development. Higher Education, 55, 735-752. doi: 10.1007/s10734-007-9093-1

Bentin, S. & Cashin, W. (2012). Student ratings of teaching: A summary and literature (IDEA Paper 50). Manhattan, KS: The IDEA Center. Retrieved from http://www.theideacenter.org/research-and-papers/idea-papers

Bernstein, D. J. (2008). Peer review and evaluation on the intellectual work of teaching. Change, 40 (2), 48 – 51. Retrieved from http://www.nus.edu.sg/teachingacademy/docs/Resource%20Review.pdf

Bingham, R., & Ottewill, R. (2001). Whatever happened to peer review? Revitalising the contribution of tutors to course evaluation. Quality Assurance in Education, 9, 32-39. doi: 10.1108/09684880110381319

Boyer, E. L. (1990). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate. Princeton, NJ: The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.

Brent, R. & Felder, R. M. (2004). A Protocol for Peer Review of Teaching. Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition. Salt Lake City, Utah.

Bramschreiber, T. (2012). Taking Peer Feedback to Heart. Educational Leadership, 70(3), retrieved from http://www.ascd.org/publications/educational-leadership/nov12/vol70/num03/Taking-Peer-Feedback-to-Heart.aspx

Brinko, K. T. (1993). The practice of giving feedback to improve teaching: What is effective? The Journal of Higher Education, 64, 574 – 593. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org.ezproxy.lib.monash.edu.au/stable/pdfplus/2959994.pdf

Brockbank, A., & McGill, I. (1998) Facilitating reflective learning in higher education. Bury St Edmunds, UK: Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.

Carroll, J. G. (1980). Effects of training programs for university teaching assistants: A review of empirical research. Journal of Higher Education, 51, 167–183. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org.ezproxy.lib.monash.edu.au/stable/pdfplus/1981372.pdf

Carter, V. K. (2008). Five steps to becoming a better peer reviewer. College Teaching, 56, 85–88. doi: 10.3200/CTCH.56.2.85-88

Cavanagh, R. R. (1996). Formative and summative evaluation in the faculty peer review of teaching. Innovative Higher Education, 20, 235 – 240. Retrieved from http://www.metapress.com.ezproxy.lib.monash.edu.au/content/h274g1432208jg30/fulltext.pdf

Clardy, A. (2013). Strengths vs strong position: rethinking the nature of SWWOT analysis. Modern Management Science and Engineering. 9(1), 100-122.

Cohen, P. A., & McKeachie, W. J. (1980).The role of colleagues in the evaluation of college teaching. Improving College and University Teaching, 28, 147–154. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org.ezproxy.lib.monash.edu.au/stable/pdfplus/27565389.pdf

Cosser, M. (1998). Towards the design of a system of peer review of teaching for the advancement of the individual within the university. Higher Education, 35, 143 – 162. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/pdfplus/3448321.pdf

Chermack, T. J., & Kasshanna, B. K. (2007). The use and misuse of SWOT analysis and implications for HRD professionals. Human Resource Development International, 10, 383 – 399. doi: 10.1080/13678860701718760

Chism, N. (2007). Peer Review of Teaching: A Sourcebook. Bolton, MA: Anker Publishing Co.

Dalgaard, K. A. (1982). Some effects of training on teaching effectiveness of untrained university teaching assistants. Research in Higher Education, 17, 39–50. Retrieved from http://www.metapress.com.ezproxy.lib.monash.edu.au/content/l734r77114273461/fulltext.pdf

Donnelly, R. (2007). Perceived impact of peer observation of teaching in higher education. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 19, 117–129. Retrieved from http://www.isetl.org/ijtlhe/pdf/IJTLHE167.pdf

Dunn, K.E. & Mulvenon, S. (2009). A critical review of research on formative assessment: The limited scientific evidence of the impact of formative assessment in education. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 14(7), 1-11.

Dyson, R. G. (2004). Strategic development and SWOT analysis at the University of Warwick. European Journal of Operational Research, 152, 631 – 640.

Farrell, K. (2011). Collegial feedback on teaching: A guide to peer review. Centre for the Study of Higher Education.

FitzPatrick, M. A., & Spiller, D. (2010). The teaching portfolio; Institutional imperative or teacher’s personal journey? Higher Education Research & Development, 29, 167 – 178. doi: 10.1080/07294360903470985

Flay, B. R., Biglan, A., Boruch, R. F., Castro, F. G., Gottfredson, D., Kellam, S., & Ji, P. (2005). Standards of evidence: Criteria for efficacy, effectiveness and dissemination. Prevention Science, 6, 151 – 175. doi: 10.1007/s11121-005-5553-y

Freiberg, H. J., Waxman, H. C., & Houston, W. R. (1987). Enriching feedback to student teachers through small group discussion. Teacher Education Quarterly, 14(3), 71–82.

Glassick, C. E. (2000). Boyer’s expanded definitions of scholarship, standards for assessing scholarship and the elusiveness of the scholarship of teaching. Academic Medicine, 9, 887-887.

Gosling, D. (2002). Models of peer observation of teaching. Retrieved from http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/resources/detail/resource_database/id200_Models_of_Peer_Observation_of_Teaching

Gravestock, P. (2011), Does teaching matter: the role of teaching evaluation in tenure policies at selected Canadian universities? (unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Toronto,

Canada. Retrieved from http://tspace.library.utoronto.ca/bitstream/1807/31764/6/ Gravestock_Pamela_S_201111_PhD_thesis.pdf

Haberberg, A. (2000). Swatting SWOT. Retrieved from http://www2.wmin.ac.uk/haberba/SwatSWOT.htm

Hammersley-Fletcher, L., & Orsmond, P. (2004). Evaluating our peers: Is peer observation a meaningful process? Studies in Higher Education, 29, 489–503. doi: 10.1080/0307507042000236380

Hammersley-Fletcher, L., & Orsmond, P. (2005). Reflecting on reflective practices within peer observation. Studies in Higher Education, 30, 213–224. doi: 10.1080/03075070500043358

Hanson, J. (1993). Observing classroom teaching in higher education: A case study. Quality Assurance in Education, 1, 26–30. doi: 10.1108/09684889310046176

Hatzipanagos, S., & Lygo-Baker, S. (2006). Teaching observations: Promoting development through critical reflection. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 30, 421–431. doi: 10.1080/03098770600965425

Helms, M. M., & Nixon, J. (2010). Exploring SWOT analysis - where are we now? A review of academic research from the last decade. Journal of Strategy and Management, 3, 215–251. doi: 10.1108/17554251011064837

Henard, F. (2009). Learning our lesson: Review of quality teaching in higher education. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/54/26/43961761.pdf.

Hubball, H. & Clarke. A. (2011). Scholarly approaches to peer-review of teaching: Emergent frameworks and outcomes in a research-intensive university. Transformative Dialogues Journal (4)2, Article 4.

Huber, M.T., & Hutchings, P. (2005). The advancement of learning: building the teahing commons. San Francisco, Jossey-Bass.

Hurst, B., Wilson, C., & Cramer, G. (1998). Professional teaching portfolios: Tools for reflection, growth, and advancement. The Phi Delta Kappan, 79, 578 – 582. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/pdfplus/20439279.pdf

Hutchings, P. (1996). The peer review of teaching: Progress, issues and prospects. Innovative Higher Education, 20, 221–234. Retrieved from http://www.metapress.com.ezproxy.lib.monash.edu.au/content/t08115u8363qg504/fulltext.pdf

Ismail, E. A., Buskist, W., Groccia, J. E. (2012). Peer review of teaching. In: Kite, M. E. (ed), Effective Evaluation of Teaching: A Guide for Faculty and Administrators. Society for the Teaching of Psychology Retrieved from http://teachpsych.org/ebooks/evals2012/index.php

James, R., McInnis, C., & Devlin, M. (2002). Assessing learning in Australian universities. Retrieved from: Hhttp://www.cshe.unimelb.edu.au/assessinglearnging/index.html.

Jenkins, A. (1996). Discipline-based educational development. International Journal for Academic Development, 1, 50–62. doi: 10.1080/1360144960010106

Keig, L., & Waggoner, M. D. (1994). Collaborative peer review: The role of faculty in improving college teaching (Technical Report No. 2). Washington DC: The George Washington University School of Education and Human Development. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED378925)

Kell, C., & Annetts, S. (2009). Peer review of teaching embedded practice or policy-holding complacency? Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 46, 61-70. doi: 10.1080/14703290802646156
Kinchin, I. M. (2005). Evolving diversity within a model of peer observation at a UK university. Retrieved from http://www.leeds.ac.uk/educol/documents/153411.doc.

Klopper, C. & Drew, S. (2013). Teaching for learning, learning for teaching: Triangulating perspectives of teaching quality through peer observation and student evaluation. In C. Nygaard, N. Courtney, & P. Bartholomew (Eds.), Quality enhancement of university teaching and learning: theories and cases.

Kohut, G. F., Burnap, C., & Yon, M. G. (2007). Peer observation of teaching: Perceptions of the observer and the observed. College Teaching, 55, 19–25. doi: 10.3200/CTCH.55.1.19-25

Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Knapper, C., & Wright, W. A. (2001). Using portfolios to document good teaching: Premises, purposes, practices. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 88, 19 – 29. Retrieved from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com.ezproxy.lib.monash.edu.au/doi/10.1002/tl.34/pdf

Kuiper, S. & Thomas, M.W. (2000). A strategic consultancy model for establishing a center for business communication. Business Communication Quarterly, 63, 52 – 67.Kumrow, D., & Dahlen,

B. (2002). Is peer review an effective approach for evaluating teachers? Peer Review, 75(5), 238–241. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org.ezproxy.lib.monash.edu.au/stable/pdfplus/30189751.pdf

Lee, S.F., Lo, K.K., Leung, R.F. & Ko, A.S.O. (2000). Strategy formulation framework for vocational education: integrating SWOT analysis, balanced scorecard, QFD methodology and MBNQA education criteria. Managerial Auditing Journal, 15, 407 - 423.

Lomas, L., & Kinchin, I. (2006). Developing a peer observation program with university teachers. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 18, 204-214. Retrieved from http://www.isetl.org/ijtlhe/pdf/IJTLHE118.pdf

Lomas, L., & Nicholls, G. (2005). Enhancing teaching quality through peer review of teaching. Quality in Higher Education, 11, 137–149. doi: 10.1080/13538320500175118

Lygmayr, A., Stockleben, B., Sou, Y., Anzenhofer, S. & Jalonen, M. (2014). Applying “design thinking” in the context of media management education. Multimedia Tools Application, 71: 119-157.

Magno, C. (2012). Assessing higher education teachers through peer assistance and review. The International Journal of Educational and Psychological Assessment, 9(2), 104-120. Retrieved from http://tijepa.books.officelive.com/Documents/A7_V9.2_TIJEPA.pdf

Malik, D. (1996). Peer review of teaching: External review of course content. Innovative Higher Education, 20, 261-269.

Morrison, M. (2006) SWOT Analysis. http://www.rapidbi.com/created/SWOTanalysis.html. Date accessed: January 29, 2014.

Murray, C. E., & Grant, G. (1998). Teacher peer review: Possibility or pipedream? Contemporary Education, 69, 202–204. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com.ezproxy.lib.monash.edu.au/docview/233035362/fulltextPDF

Nicholls, G. (2001). Professional development in higher education: New dimensions and directions. London: Kogan Page.

Odell, S. J., & Ferraro, D. P. (1992). Teacher mentoring and teacher retention. Journal of Teacher Education, 43, 200–204. doi: 10.1177/0022487192043003006

Peel, D. (2005). Peer observation as a transformatory tool? Teaching in Higher Education, 10, 489-504. doi: 10.1080/13562510500239125

Quinlan, K. M., & Akerlind, G. S. (2000). Factors affecting departmental peer collaboration for faculty development: Two cases in context. Higher Education, 40, 23-52. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org.ezproxy.lib.monash.edu.au/stable/pdfplus/3447950.pdf

Ramsden, P. (1992). Learning to teach in higher education. London: Routledge.

Ramsden, P. (2003). Learning to teach in higher education (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.

Ryan, M. & Ryan, M. (2012). Theorizing a model for teaching and assessing reflective learning in higher education. Higher Education Research and Development, 1-14

Safavid, S.A., Bakar, K.a., Tarmizi, R. A.,& Alwi, N. H. (2013). Faculty perception of improvements to instructional practices in response to student ratings. Educational Assessment Evaluation Accountability 25: 143-153.

Sharma, M. (2005). Health education in India: A strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) analysis. The International Electronic Journal of Health Education, 8, 80–85. Retrieved from http://www.eric.ed.gov/PDFS/EJ794068.pdf

Shortland, S. (2010). Feedback within peer observation: Continuing professional development and unexpected consequences. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 47, 295-304. doi: 10.1080/14703297.2010.498181

Shulman, L. (1993). Teaching as community property. Change, 25, 6-7.

Smith, K. (2009). Transnational teaching experiences: An under-explored territory for transformative professional development. International Journal for Academic Development, 14, 111–122. doi: 10.1080/13601440902969975

Stein, S. J., Spiller, D., Terry, S., Harris, T., Deaker, L., & Kennedy, J. (2013). Tertiary teachers and Student evaluations: never the twain shall meet? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 1-1. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2013.767876

Steinert, Y. (2000). Faculty development in the new millennium: Key challenges and future directions. Edictal Teacher, 22(1), 44-50).

University Teaching Development Centre. (2004). Improving teaching and learning: Peer observation of teaching. Retrieved from http://www.utdc.vuw.ac.nz/resources/guidelines/PeerObservation.pdf.

Van Note Chism, N. (2006). Teaching awards: What do they award? The Journal of Higher Education, 77, 589 – 617. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/pdfplus/3838709.pdf

Westhues, A., Lafrance, J., & Schmidt, G. (2001). A SWOT analysis of social work education in Canada. Journal of Social Work Education, 20, 35-56. doi: 10.1080/02615470020028364

Wubbels, T., & Korthagen, F. A. J. (1990). The effects of a pre-service teacher education program for the preparation of reflective teachers, Journal of Education for Teaching, 16, 29-43. doi: 10.1080/0260747900160102
Published
2017-12-15
How to Cite
RAJ, Sony Jalarajan; MASSEY, Susan R.; JOSE, Soumya. Peer Review and Reflective Teaching Practices: An Effective Mechanism for Quality Enhancement in Higher Education. International SERIES on Information Systems and Management in Creative eMedia (CreMedia), [S.l.], n. 2017/1, p. 193-240, dec. 2017. ISSN 2341-5576. Available at: <http://www.ambientmediaassociation.org/Journal/index.php/series/article/view/264>. Date accessed: 22 aug. 2019.
Share |